Why Did the Kerensky Government Become Unpopular in Russia?

The period between the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917 and the Bolshevik Revolution in November 1917 was one of immense political upheaval in Russia. The Provisional Government, led by Alexander Kerensky, was established to govern Russia after the fall of the Romanov dynasty. Initially, there was widespread hope that this government would steer the nation toward democracy and stability. However, within a few months, the Kerensky government lost public support and became highly unpopular, eventually being overthrown by the Bolsheviks.

So, what led to the downfall of the Kerensky government? Several key factors contributed to its growing unpopularity, ranging from poor decision-making and continued involvement in World War I to socio-economic challenges and political instability. Let’s explore these reasons in detail.

1. Continued Participation in World War I

One of the most critical reasons for the unpopularity of the Kerensky government was its decision to continue Russia’s involvement in World War I. The war had already devastated Russia’s economy, caused widespread hunger, and led to the deaths of millions of soldiers. The people of Russia, particularly workers and peasants, wanted an immediate end to the war.

However, Kerensky believed that Russia needed to fulfill its commitments to the Allies. He launched the June Offensive against German forces, hoping to boost national morale and gain international support. Unfortunately, the offensive was a disaster, leading to heavy Russian losses and further demoralization of the army. This decision made the government appear disconnected from the suffering of the people and the realities of war, significantly eroding public trust.

2. Failure to Address Land Reforms

The majority of Russia’s population were peasants who longed for land reform. They wanted the redistribution of land from wealthy landowners to those who worked it. The fall of the Tsar had raised hopes that the new government would finally address these demands.

However, Kerensky’s Provisional Government delayed land reforms, arguing that such decisions should be left to the future Constituent Assembly. This indecision angered the peasants, who began seizing land illegally. The government’s inability to provide a clear solution to the land question alienated a significant portion of the population, further weakening its support base.

3. Weak and Ineffective Governance

The Provisional Government under Kerensky was perceived as weak and indecisive. It faced constant challenges from the Petrograd Soviet, which represented workers and soldiers. The concept of dual power—where the Provisional Government and the Soviets both claimed authority—led to confusion and ineffective governance.

Kerensky tried to balance the demands of conservatives who wanted order and revolutionaries who wanted radical change. In trying to appease both sides, he satisfied neither. His government failed to implement meaningful reforms, leading to growing frustration among all sections of society.

4. The Kornilov Affair

The Kornilov Affair in August 1917 was a turning point that further damaged Kerensky’s reputation. General Lavr Kornilov, the commander-in-chief of the Russian army, attempted to march on Petrograd with the aim of restoring order and potentially establishing a military dictatorship.

Kerensky initially supported Kornilov’s efforts to strengthen the government’s position but later accused him of attempting a coup. To counter Kornilov, Kerensky armed the Bolsheviks and the Red Guards, ironically strengthening the very group that would soon overthrow him. The affair exposed the government’s weakness and deep divisions, causing Kerensky to lose the support of both the military and moderate political forces.

5. Rising Popularity of the Bolsheviks

While the Provisional Government floundered, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, gained popularity by offering simple yet powerful slogans: “Peace, Land, and Bread” and “All Power to the Soviets.” The Bolsheviks promised to end the war, redistribute land to the peasants, and transfer power to the Soviets—promises that resonated deeply with the masses.

The government’s failure to deliver on these key issues made the Bolsheviks appear as the only credible force capable of addressing the needs of the people. As workers, soldiers, and peasants increasingly supported the Bolsheviks, the Kerensky government’s position became untenable.

6. Economic Crisis and Social Unrest

Russia was also grappling with a severe economic crisis. Food shortages, inflation, and strikes became common. Urban workers faced terrible working conditions and low wages, leading to widespread protests. The government’s inability to improve economic conditions led to social unrest and further diminished its popularity.

Additionally, the soldiers, exhausted from the war and disillusioned with the lack of progress, deserted in large numbers. The breakdown of law and order, coupled with economic hardship, created an environment ripe for revolution.

Conclusion

The unpopularity of the Kerensky government in Russia can be attributed to its poor handling of critical issues such as continued involvement in World War I, failure to address land reforms, weak governance, the disastrous Kornilov Affair, and the inability to tackle the economic crisis. Moreover, the rise of the Bolsheviks, who offered clear solutions to the problems faced by ordinary Russians, further undermined the Provisional Government.

In the end, Alexander Kerensky’s government was overthrown during the October Revolution of 1917, marking the beginning of Bolshevik rule and the establishment of Soviet Russia. The fall of the Kerensky government serves as a powerful lesson in history—highlighting how indecision, weak leadership, and disconnect from public sentiment can lead to the collapse of even the most promising governments.

Scroll to Top